KANSAS CITY, Mo. -- Things couldnt have gone more differently for Jets quarterback Ryan Fitzpatrick.The reigning AFC offensive player of the week for his near-perfect performance against Buffalo came back with one of the worst games of his career, a six-interception meltdown against the Kansas City Chiefs on Sunday that doomed New York to a 24-3 defeat.Its tough, Fitzpatrick said. The NFL, football in general, is a humbling game. Every single week is a different week no matter the opponent, no matter how good youre feeling. We went out there and didnt play well today. Obviously, thats an understatement.The about-face occurred in a matter of 10 days.Fitzpatrick was 24 of 34 for 374 yards and a touchdown against the Bills, the fourth-best game of his career in terms of yardage. He was 20 of 44 for 188 yards against the Chiefs, and three interceptions came in the end zone just as the Jets were about to score.The awful offense wasnt only his fault.Running back Matt Forte, who scored three times against the Bills, was held to just 65 yards by a Chiefs defense intent on stopping him. Bilal Powell was limited to 30 yards rushing and had a fumble, one of the eight turnovers by the Jets -- just two off the franchise record.Brandon Marshall caught three of his 10 targets, playing through a slight knee sprain. Eric Decker had his only catch in the fourth quarter, failing to score for the first time in seven games. And emerging star Quincy Enunwa was a non-factor, catching four passes on 11 targets.All told, the Jets managed just 305 yards of total offense.We had a couple of extra days to rest and prepare for this game and we came out flat, Decker said. In a game when you get behind fast like that against a good team, its going to be tough crawling back.The other two facets of the game didnt help their offense.While the Jets defense held Kansas City to just 293 yards, it also surrendered 15 plays of 10 or more -- including a 42-yard reception to tight end Travis Kelce. And on special teams, rookie Jalin Marshall fumbled a kick return that the Chiefs returned for a touchdown.We missed tackles. We had trouble with leverage. We had trouble with minor things, Jets coach Todd Bowles said. When nothing works we got to change everything. It was a (lousy) game plan, obviously. By the execution and the score, it was (lousy). You cant point to one thing.But Fitzpatrick is at least pointing to one thing: himself.Ill take it, he said. Ill put it on me. I didnt play well. When I dont play well like I did today, then were gonna have a hard time winning football games thats just the nature of the NFL and the nature of being a quarterback. Ive got to forget about this one, move on and show up next week.---Online: AP NFL website: www.pro32.ap.org and www.twitter.com/AP-NFL Lamar Jackson Youth Jersey . Laudrup revealed Thursday he was notified of his dismissal in "the briefest of letters which gave no reasons why such hasty and final action was deemed necessary. Ray Lewis Ravens Jersey . After Gasquet beat fifth-seeded Ivan Dodig of Croatia 7-5, 6-3, Tsonga followed up with a 6-7 (3), 6-2, 6-2 win against sixth-seeded Edouard Roger-Vasselin in an all-French match. http://www.cheapravensshoponline.com/Youth-Justin-Tucker-Ravens-Jersey/ . No. 13-seeded John Isner and No. 21 Philipp Kohlschreiber were among six players who dropped out of the tournament on Tuesday, joining No. 12 seed Tommy Haas and two other players who withdrew on Monday. Marquise Brown Youth Jersey . I cant pinpoint a date, but I do remember a player from my youth. Brian Downing was with the Chicago White Sox at a time when I listened to every game I possibly could on the radio. That particular season the late great Harry Caray was calling the White Sox games. Jonathan Ogden Womens Jersey . Scott won the Australian PGA last week in his first event in Australia since winning the U.S. Masters in April. American Matt Kuchar, ahead by two strokes with four to play and even with Scott with one to go, double-bogeyed the 18th after taking two shots to get out of a bunker.Residents of San Diego will today vote on whether or not to build a new stadium for the Chargers. The outcome could have wide reaching effects on the future of the franchise, with a possibility of moving the team out of the city if the proposals are rejected. It has been a confusing process from the start, and any outcome is likely to offer more questions than firm answers. However, this is what we know so far. WATCH: Graham hurdles defender Jimmy Graham scored two touchdowns in week nine but it was his hurdle that caught the eye. What is the proposal? Ballot Measure C - the official name for the vote proposes that a new, Super Bowl ready stadium would be built to replace the ageing Qualcomm Stadium, the current home of the San Diego Chargers.The facility would also be used as a trade centre and music venue, available 300 days a year, according to team executives.The stadium would require $1.8 billion, raised by increasing the hotel taxes from 12.5 per cent to 16.5 per cent, as well as $650m pledged by the NFL and Chargers owner Dean Spanos.There is also a separate proposal - Ballot Measure D - which, if passed, gives the Chargers organisation the right to build the stadium but without any public funds. This measure would still raise taxes on hotel occupation, to be used for the construction of the convention centre. Chargers fans have been kept in the dark regarding the franchises future What are the conditions of the vote?To pass, there must be a two-thirds majority in favour of the Chargers stadium plans. However there is potential that, should over 50 per cent of the public vote yes, this may be enough, as the Californian Supreme Court can lower the voting threshold.Who is for/against?Obviously the Chargers are pushing for the move, but they have garnered the support of Mayor Kevin Faulconer. Measure C is also backed by the San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce and Downtown San Diego Partnership. The San Diego Taxpayers Association is staunchly against the proposal, claiming that Spanos hass spent $5m on a popularity campaign.dddddddddddd Current opinion polls would indicate that only 45 per cent of voters would approve Measure C, which would not be enough for a stadium change in the city. Opinion polls suggest only 45 per cent of residents will vote in favour of a new stadium What are the potential outcomes?If the majority is achieved, the Chargers would look to build a stadium in East Village, the largest urban neighbourhood in Downtown San Diego. The increase in tax is predicted to raise $1.15 billion, enough to cover the remainder of the stadiums bill. If the proposals are rejected, but still achieve over 50 per cent of votes, the franchise may look to take legal action and force the bill through.Lower than a 50 per cent result and the chances of the organisation leaving the city increases dramatically. The Chargers have the option of joining the Rams in Los Angeles, but this would need to be agreed by January 2017, and it is clear that a ground share would be neither sides preference. The Chargers have a loyal fan base in San Diego, and a move to a new city would likely mean starting again Moving in with the Oakland Raiders is also an option, as is replacing the Raiders if they were to go Las Vegas. There is even the outside possibility that the Raiders could end up in San Diego if the Chargers left for Los Angeles. However a rejection of the vote doesnt confirm the team moving. They have a contract in Qualcomm until 2020, and even then could negotiate a rolling deal to stay, if it proved to be the best option in the short term.Ultimately the decision is still up in the air, whatever the vote. However the outcome will provide an important gauge for Spanos on the future of the NFL in San Diego. Also See: Officials confusion over Bills field goal Seahawks hold on to beat Bills NFL week nine highlights RESULT: Week 10 game choice ' ' '